
Home
Association
Cousins ancestries & web sites
Documents
Genealogy by Alpheus Harlan
Genealogy Data
Great Trek
Historical Sites
History by Louis Harlan
Irish Interlude
Messages
Name Origins of Harlan
Names Upon the Land
Newsletter
Ninety-Plus Club
Reunions
Store
Stories
Tours
Who's Who
Site hosted by

Comments or suggestions?
Morgan Harlan, Webmaster kmladd@mac.com
|
George and Michael Harlan:
The Irish Interlude
by John H. Harland
Having sailed from Belfast, Ireland, George and Michael Harlan arrived
in the Quaker colony on the Delaware in 1687. They were born in England
near the City of Durham in the Bishopric (Episcopate) of Durham, but prior
to leaving for America, they spent a period, perhaps 15 years, living
near Lurgan, County Armagh, Northern Ireland. It is this Irish interlude
I wish to consider, and in a rather unsystematic fashion in the course
of discussion, attempt to answer the following questions:
Why did the Brothers forsake England for Ireland?
Why did they choose to settle in the Lurgan area rather than somewhere
else?
How was it that they could take up land there, to which native Irish
presumably had a prior claim?
And finally, what persuaded them to go to America?
Answering this involves constructing a sort of snapshot of what was going
on in the world in 1687, outlining the relevant events leading up to that
date, and where necessary, indicating what happened later. My model for
this approach is John E. Wills: 1688: A Global History {1}, which drew
together events in a single year in the 17th century, and described what
was happening at that particular time all over the world. The scope of
my account is less ambitious, but follows a similar plan.
The World in 1687
Great events were unfolding in England and the world at large during
the 17th century, but my guess is that the Brothers' intellectual horizon
was quite constricted, and that the great sweep of world history left
them untouched, untroubled and uninterested. At the time they were preparing
to go to America, Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685, and Robert
LaSalle, who lost his life in 1687, was working his way down the Ohio,
Missouri and Mississippi rivers, establishing the claim of France to large
tracts of territory in North America. The Thirty Years War, the Franco-Spanish
War, and the Anglo-Dutch Wars, which had raged earlier in the century,
were of little concern to them, and catastrophes like the Great Plague
of London in 1665 and the Great Fire the following year would have seemed
quite remote.
Irish History
Since we are concerned with the Brothers' sojourn in Ireland, some understanding
of the story of that island is important. The ethnicity and culture of
England had been repeatedly modified by invasion since Roman times, and
although similar considerations apply to Ireland, remoteness has its advantage,
and the native Celts were better insulated than their English neighbors
from foreign influences. The genetic makeup of the modern Irish is predominantly
that of their Celtic ancestors. The Irish suffered many military defeats
over the years, but the country was never subjugated to the extent that
the majority of its citizens became quietly resigned to foreign rule.
The history is complicated, but for our purposes, we may summarize events
this way.
The Vikings had invaded Ireland in the 9th century and then the Anglo-Normans
(themselves of Viking ancestry) came in the 12th. Henry VIII declared
himself King of Ireland in 1541, and the Tudors made significant landgrants
to favorites of the Crown. Whereas these manors continued to be tenanted
by Irish peasants, there was a change in policy during the reign of Elizabeth
(1558-1603), and efforts were made to import substantial numbers of English
settler-tenants. The incomers for the most part lived inside the "pales"
or boundaries of the cites of Waterford, Cork, Limerick, and Dublin. Needless
to say, their presence was resented by the natives, and during the Elizabethan
era, there were rebellions in 1559, 1569 and 1594. The last of these,
led by Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone, continued to 1603 and is remembered
as the Nine Years War. During the conflict both sides practiced scorched
earth tactics, and the Irish countryside was laid waste by fire, sword
and famine. Following a series of military successes by the Irish, notably
the Battle of the Yellow Ford, which reinforced Tyrone's reputation as
a military commander, a Spanish force of 3500 men landed at Kinsale and
was besieged there by the English under Lord Mountjoy. Winston Graham
refers to this event as "The Fourth Armada"{2}. The Earls of
Tyrone (O'Neill) and Tyrconnel (O'Donnell) marched south to raise the
siege, but the Irish-Spanish forces were defeated at the Battle of Kinsale
in 1601. The surviving Spaniards were repatriated, and the Earls were
allowed to regain control of their lands by surrendering them to the Sovereign,
who then graciously re-granted them. By agreeing to this, the Earls acknowledged
the supremacy of the Crown in the person of King James I. We may digress
here to point out that traditionally, land was held by the clan as a whole;
that the eldest son did not necessarily succeed his father as head of
the clan; and that the native Irish were more concerned with herding their
flocks and herds over a grazing area, than they were with tilling the
land in a specific place. The regrant process was done along feudal lines,
with inheritance depending on primogeniture, and specific territory being
allocated to specific individuals.
Peace was declared at the Treaty of Mellifont in 1603, but Tyrone and
his associates had created too many enemies for this to settle matters,
and among the English authorities were those relentlessly plotting their
downfall. Troops under command of the Earl of Tyrone had killed the brother
of Sir Arthur Chichester during the War, and the latter, now Lord Deputy
of Ireland, was engaged in a personal vendetta against the Earl of Tyrone.
By the summer of 1607 O'Neill felt that he was in imminent danger of arrest,
imprisonment, and execution, and together the Earl of Tyrconnell and about
a hundred others, boarded ship and fled the country. Things might have
been different had Tyrone ever fulfilled his intended desire to return,
but this he never achieved before dying in exile in Rome in 1616 {3}.
The Ulster Plantation
At the end of the 16th Century, of all the Irish Provinces, Ulster (basically
the northern part of the island), remained the most Celtic in tradition,
laws, religion and ethnicity. Although the number of folk who sailed with
the Earls was very modest, the Flight of the Earls proved to be pivotal
in Irish history because it was the catalyst that transformed Ulster into
the least Irish of its Provinces. The event could be considered as the
beginning of an Irish diaspora which, in later years, was to dramatically
reduce the population of the Island. The vacuum left by the departure
of O'Neill and O'Donnell gave the authorities the excuse to confiscate
their lands, roughly speaking the counties of Derry, Fermanagh and Armagh,
and the trigger for the Plantation was the desire to neuter further threat
of Irish rebellion by "planting" the escheated territory with
great numbers of Scots and English dissenters. In his capacity as King
of Scotland, James was glad to see the back of many of his less law-abiding
citizens, and by transporting these folk across the Irish Sea, the authorities
in England and Scotland killed two birds with one stone - at a stroke
they disencumbered themselves of lawless Scottish Lowlanders and troublemaking
English dissenters, while establishing on the seized lands a population
who would offer a rabidly Protestant bulwark against the indigenous Irish
Catholic inhabitants. As an added bonus the Crown made money by selling
off large tracts of land to "undertakers". These latter committed
themselves to attract settlers as tenants or leaseholders, bringing specified
numbers in, within a specified time; build lightly fortified forts or
"bawns"; and organize their defense by providing arms and powder
for the settlers. Some of the dispossessed Irish were killed, or transported
as slaves to the West Indies, while others took to the hills to survive
as rapparees, descending on the newcomers' farms when opportunity offered.
Some remained to work as laborers for their new masters, living alongside
the Protestant newcomers, but they did not do so happily, and this was
to have repercussions in 1641 {4}.
Of the various Irish "Plantations" only that in Ulster was
successful. Even so, it never met the aims of those who framed the scheme,
in that it did not totally replace the native Irish Catholic population
with English and Scottish Protestants. "Success," as defined
by that criterion, was greater in the eastern part of Ulster, such as
the fertile land around Lurgan, and almost nonexistent in Donegal with
an intermediate spectrum found as one moved west. The undertakers could
not always meet their obligations and attract enough Protestant planters,
and in those parts where the land was infertile, the landlords, if they
were derive income, had no choice but to content themselves with selling
off the timber, and rent to Irish tenants. Despite the various legal proscriptions
and fiscal measures discouraging this practice, renting to the Irish could
be highly profitable for the landowner because these tenants were obliged
to pay three times the rent of a Protestant planter. Of significance to
Harlan Family history, is an area in northeast Armagh, near the modern
town of Lurgan. This was part of the Barony of Oneilland, confiscated
from the O'Neill clan in 1607 and ceded to the Brownlow family as undertakers.
This area was settled largely with English, as distinct from Scottish,
planters, and remarkably to this day, dialectologists can detect traces
of this difference in background in the speech of folk of this particular
area. Surviving records indicate that tenants on the Brownlow estate included
Peter Harland, townland of Ballyblagh in 1635, and John Harland, townland
of Liscorran in 1659 [These townlands are now totally overbuilt and incorporated
in the town of Lurgan.] Peter is listed on a Muster Roll as "pikeman,"
and this together with the early dates suggest that he was not a Quaker,
at least not then. It would seem they survived the events of 1641 described
below, and if, as seems probable from the family name, they were related
to the Brothers, their prior presence in the area is another reason why
the later arrivals chose to settle near Lurgan.
We have to remember that the Ulster Plantation was undertaken at a moment
of national paranoia, and planned in extreme haste. King James, having
survived the Gunpowder Plot of 1605, lived in dread of further Catholic
conspiracy {5}, and there was widespread apprehension that at any moment
the Earl of Tyrone would land back in Ireland with an invading Spanish
army and reclaim his hereditary lands. On the one hand, while this made
the authorities keen to establish planters, worry about Tyrone discouraged
settlers from coming, and so made it more difficult for the undertakers
to meet their commitments. Everything had to be done in such a hurry,
and no attempt was made to resurvey the land the tenants would occupy.
It was far quicker from everyone's point of view to just accept the Irish
system of land division and although the newcomers were not Irish speaking,
retain the traditional Irish place-names - which indeed remain in use
to this day. Townlands were a peculiarly Irish unit of land division,
their names commonly referring to some local geographical feature {6}.
Parishes also retained their original names and in great part, Roman Catholic,
Anglican and Civil Parishes had the same boundaries.
The 1641 uprising
In 1641, rebellion broke out again, but this occurred while the English
were distracted by Civil War between Parliament and King Charles I, and
consequently things went badly for the English. In the part of Ireland
relevant to our story, Irish troops under Sir Phelim O'Neill and Sir Conn
Magennis captured several towns, and by superior tactics defeated the
Scottish general Robert Munro at the Battle of Benburb in 1642. Atrocities
and counter-atrocities followed, with some settlers being killed, and
others becoming discouraged and returning to England. The Plantation in
Munster, initiated by Elizabeth, never recovered from this setback, but
in Ulster the number of planters was to rebound after the uprising had
been quelled {7}.
Cromwell's Pacification
In 1649, having dealt with affairs in England and Scotland, Oliver Cromwell
landed in Ireland determined to crush the rebels once and for all. This
"pacification" was executed with such signal brutality that
Cromwell's name remains anathema in Ireland to this day. Following the
defeat of the Irish at Limerick in 1650, the estates of the rebels were
confiscated and used by Cromwell to pay off his army. As to the indigenous
Irish, they were to be driven out
in Cromwell's phrase, sent "to
Hell or to Connacht." Of special relevance to us, is the land he
seized in the Barony of Lower Iveagh and awarded to troops serving under
Colonel John Barrett. This land included the Parish of Donaghcloney. [Domhnach
Cluana "Church of the Meadow." Alpheus Harlan consistently misspelled
the name as "Donnalong."] The common soldiers sold their shares
to Barrett, who in turn transferred his interest to another Cromwellian
officer, William Waring. It was upon the Waring estate that the Brothers
settled when they arrived from England, and although we cannot establish
a specific date for this, given the occurrence of their names on Quaker
records, we can say it preceded 1678. Although Alpheus Harlan does not
specify an exact location, my guess is that they settled in the townland
of Corcreeny, which lies almost due south of Lurgan and a bit west of
Waringstown. This is only a mile or two from the parish of Shankill in
County Armagh where Peter Harland of Ballyblagh lived. The Parish of Donaghcloney,
County Down, immediately abuts the neighboring parishes of Shankill and
Seagoe in Armagh, but as I hope we have made clear, the land history on
each side of the Down/Armagh border was different, with Donaghcloney only
becoming 'available' to foreign settlers after 1651.
Net Population shift
There were ups and downs in the numbers of planters - a push-pull situation
obtained with the numbers ebbing and flowing, but with a net gain over
time. Fluctuations depended partly on the competence of the undertaker,
his ability to attract settlers, and the fertility of the land; but also
on those pressures existing in the location the settlers came from, tending
to drive them out. For instance, the Brothers came to Ireland at a time
when Quakers were being given a hard time in Durham; many Scots left home
during the harassment of the Covenanters and "the Killing times"
in Scotland in the late 1680s; on the other hand, the imposition in Ireland
of the so-called "Black Oath" in 1639 caused discontentment
among the Presbyterians and encouraged many of them to return to Scotland
{8}, {9}. Economic factors played a huge part, and the Brothers were pulled,
rather than pushed, leaving Lurgan when things were in fact going fairly
well there
in other words. Indeed they left just prior to the rise
in the general prosperity that followed the establishment of the linen
industry in and around the town. Over the next two centuries the cultivation
of flax and manufacture of linen were to exert a major effect on the economy
of the area and the Province. [This was a side effect of the Revocation
of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, which resulted in wholesale emigration
of the Huguenots, and the expulsion from France of an important class
of entrepreneurs and skilled tradesmen. France's loss was Ireland's gain,
and in a way, it was analogous to the expulsion of a talented segment
of the population by the Third Reich.]
Starting about 1717, a steady trickle of people left Ulster, and gradually
this increased to a torrent, which was only interrupted by the War of
Independence in 1776. With numbers peaking in the early 1770s, somewhere
around 200,000 folk emigrated from Ulster to the American Colonies, and
it is claimed that in 1790, of the nearly half million folk in America
who were of Irish stock, two-thirds derived from Ulster {10}. The egress
resulted from large families and rapid growth of population in Ulster,
outflow increasing when there were poor harvests or a downturn in the
linen industry, and decreasing when the local economy picked up. Additional
encouragement to emigrate resulted from the imposition of oppressive laws
such as the Sacramental Test Act of 1704, which were aimed at Catholics
and Dissenters alike.
The Scots-Irish, as American historians refer to this group, arrived
in America with perhaps the perfect mind-set for an immigrant at that
particular juncture in the history of a young nation. Frontiersmen were
pushing their way westward from the early settlements, like that on the
Delaware, which had attracted the Brothers; and the new arrivals, with
their built-in "Settler Mentality," were perfectly suited to
the task of opening up potentially hostile territory. In Ireland they
had learned how to farm their land, while keeping an eye on the surrounding
hills, alert for the descent of marauding rapparees intent on burning
the barns and driving off the cattle. In addition they brought with them
a tradition of political radicalism and distrust of Westminster, which
influenced political affairs in the run-up to the War of Independence.
Eight out of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence were
Ulstermen by birth or one generation away {11}. Emigration was to recommence
after 1783, but after about 1830 the Ulster emigrants were outnumbered
by Irish from other parts of the Island. As a consequence of the Irish
Famine at the middle of the 19th century, it is estimated that one million
people died, and a further three million left Ireland for good, many of
them coming to America. Ireland was changed utterly by this depopulation.
{12}
The Third Brother
Thomas Harland was the elder brother of George and Michael and had come
with them from Durham. By 1687 Thomas was a married man of about 40 years
of age, with a large and growing family. He had married Katherine Bullock
on 7 February 1680 in the Quaker manner at the "house of Francis
Robinson in the Parish of Segoe, County Armagh." His wife died in
March 1690. He must have approved the decision of his brothers to go to
America and may have helped finance the venture, but he himself elected
to stay in Ireland rather than go to the Delaware, and perhaps his reluctance
to move was dictated by his family situation. There is uncertainty concerning
his date of death, but Quaker records at the Public Records Office in
Northern Ireland [PRONI] list the burial of a Thomas Harland at Moyraverty
Quaker Burial Ground (near Lurgan) in 1683. Quaker records are sometimes
misleading as when dealing with a marriage, etc., it is not always clear
who were the prime-moves and who were just witnesses. We agree with Alpheus
Harlan that he remarried, and records show that a Thomas Harland did marry
Alice Foster, of Lisnegarvy at Richard Boyes house, Ballinderry Meeting,
County of Armagh, in 1702. They were the parents of two sons, James and
Thomas, and a daughter, Abigail. There is also a 1723 reference to a Thomas
Harland being given assistance by the Friends following a fire "he
being too old to recoup alone," but there the trail goes cold. My
own family believes we are descendants of Thomas, but there were other
Harlands in the Lurgan area, and this claim, and hence our claim of connection
to the Harlan Family in America, is beyond proof or disproof.
Harlands are to be found in the Lurgan area to this day, and I know that
some members of the Harlan Family Association have had the opportunity
to meet Jim Harland and his charming wife Lillian, who live in Lurgan.
He is of particular interest, in that he must be a descendant of Thomas
Harland, brother of George and Michael, since following a tradition going
back over three hundred years, the family are still members of the Lurgan
Quaker Meeting.
In the matter of the presence or absence of terminal "d": I
always imagined that the Brothers intentionally dropped this after going
to America, perhaps after meeting Huguenots who used that spelling. However,
in the 17th century, the orthography was not fixed, and reflecting the
level of literacy obtaining at the time, in Irish records we find the
name spelled both ways - not to mention Harlen and Harlin.
The original inhabitants
We have already outlined what in a general way the fate of the Irish
peasants, but what of the owners of the Parish of Donaghcloney and the
land upon which the Brothers settled? The Magennis family were the hereditary
territorial lords of Iveagh, County Down, and like many of the great Irish
septs took advantage of the English policy of "surrender and re-grant"
following the Treaty of Mellifont in 1603. In the early 17th century,
the land was parceled out to individual members of the Magennis family,
but in many cases by the time of the 1641 rebellion, the recipients had
sold their interest to others, including English and Scots settlers. I
am told that Donaghcloney was owned by a cousin of Sir Arthur Magennis,
who had been created Viscount Iveagh by King James I in 1623. This chap
must have backed the wrong horse in the rebellion of 1641 since Donaghcloney
was confiscated by Cromwell in 1651 [Dr. Eoin Magennis: Personal communication]
{13}.
The details are a bit uncertain, but after the defeat of James II in
1691, if not earlier, the hereditary leaders of the Clan Magennis left
Ireland, along with thousands of other "Wild Geese" {14}, {15},
{16}. [The term "Wild Geese" was originally applied to Irish
soldiers who left the country in 1691 with Patrick Sarsfield, but is now
commonly applied to those who preceded and followed them. For whatever
reason, professional soldiering has had great appeal to the Irish. During
the 18th and 19th centuries the British Army was heavily dependent on
recruitment in Ireland, but significant numbers of Irishmen served in
various continental armies. The tradition goes back to the Irish Regiment,
"Tercio Irlanda," fighting in Flanders for Spain in the reign
of Elizabeth, and extends to, by some estimates, 200,000 men who fought
in Irish Regiments of the French army, between 1692 to 1792. Following
the Treaty of Rijswijk in 1697, some of the French regiments were disbanded;
those demobilized sought employment as professional soldiers in other
countries. Brian, second Baron Iveagh, was killed in 1703 while fighting
in the Austrian service against the Turks. His brother Roger, third Baron,
was killed in 1709, and judging by the date this happened at the Battle
of Malplaquet. The hereditary title was resuscitated in 1891, when Sir
Edward C. Guinness became Baron of Iveagh in 1891.]
Religion
This overarches everything, and our story can only be viewed in the context
of the religious turmoil that characterized the 17th and 18th centuries.
Looking back from a more secular age, we find it almost inconceivable
that folk of that day could become so obsessed with doctrinal minutiae,
as to cause them to behave towards each other in the way they did - acting
in an extremely unchristian manner towards those with whom they disagreed,
and not being loath to take up arms and slay anyone who did not support
their particular theological perspective. However, these sectarian differences
were the engine driving many of the events we will be discussing, and
I will try in as unbiased a fashion as possible, to outline in a few paragraphs
the religious background of the mid-17th Century, as it affects the Brothers'
story. The historical record is far from tidy and it is impossible to
list and analyze the interrelationships of all the denominations that
arose in a period of intense spiritual hunger and intellectual ferment,
but here are the main points.
Catholicism
The Roman Catholic church was the spiritual ancestor of all the other
Christian sects that feature in the story. In the 16th century, Martin
Luther and Henry VIII had, for quite different reasons, broken with the
Papal authorities. In England, the Church of England, at whose head stood
the Monarch, was the official state religion, but in 1603, at the end
of the reign of Queen Elizabeth, the "Old Religion" was far
from extirpated in England, and the Church's position correspondingly
far from secure. Upon his accession in 1603, James I was inclined to be
tolerant, but the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 permanently hardened his attitude,
and the adherents of the Old Religion and especially its priests were
extremely roughly handled. In England, by 1687, oppressive measures had
been successful in reducing Catholics to a minority position, but in Ireland,
the people had no reason to acknowledge a new religious leader, and both
peasants (Old Irish) and landowners (Old English) stubbornly clung to
their Catholic faith. Irish Catholics had been oppressed from Tudor times,
but things got much worse following the uprising of 1641, and following
the Willamette wars fifty years later, a succession of brutally oppressive
and unjust Penal Laws made their lot nearly impossible. This is not the
forum to discuss injustices inflicted prior to and during the Protestant
Ascendancy in Ireland, but suffice it to say that they generated resentments
that reverberate to the present day.
Church of England and Church of Ireland
These were the "Established" state religions, and the significant
aspect of this as it affects our story, was the Church's authority to
extract "tithes" from the citizens in each parish. Below, we
will take note the fashion in which this ecclesiastical tax impacted the
Brothers.
Puritans and Presbyterians
English Puritans came to New England in 1620 and, as the Pilgrim Fathers,
played an important role in the early history of America. In the homeland,
the influence of the Puritan wing of the Church of England increased
to the point where they gained control of Parliament, and step by step,
this led to Civil War, which started in 1642 and ended with the beheading
of Charles I in 1649. Following the Restoration of the Monarchy in 1660,
some Puritans remained within the Church of England, establishing the
Low Church tradition within it, while others broke away to form the Presbyterian
and other Protestant denominations. In Scotland, the key figure in establishment
of the Presbyterian Church was John Knox, who was himself greatly influenced
by Swiss Calvinism. The Scottish Presbyterians are important to our story,
because they comprised the majority of the settlers involved in the colonization
of Ulster. They supported the Parliamentary side in 1643, with the signing
of the Covenant, but subsequently had a falling out with Cromwell. During
the reign of James II, at almost exactly the time the Brothers left Ireland,
the Presbyterians in Scotland were being cruelly treated by the authorities,
in the person of Graham of Claverhouse - an era remembered as "the
Killing Times."
The Huguenots
French Protestants, who fled the country of their birth in great numbers
following the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, were known as
Huguenots. A significant number came to Ulster, where they contributed
in large measure to the establishment of the Irish linen industry. Besides
this, the army that William III brought to Ireland in 1689 included Huguenot
regiments, and some chose to stay after the campaign in Ireland. However,
because the Brothers departed Ireland in 1687, my guess is that they had
scant contact with Huguenots during their sojourn in Lurgan, although
they undoubtedly met numerous French Emigres following their move to Pennsylvania.
The Society of Friends
George and Michael Harlan were members of the Society of Friends, or
Quakers, and since this particular Christian sect has special significance
in the story of the Harlan Family, we will consider it in some detail.
The movement was founded by George Fox (1624-91), and at the time of its
inception, it was just one among many dissenting sects of the day, like
the Diggers, Seekers, Ranters, Muggletonians, etc., all of which are today
just footnotes in the history of religion. Although it never numbered
a huge number of adherents, Quakerism influenced society and events in
17th and 18th centuries in Britain and in the early history of the American
colonies, far out of proportion to the size of the denomination. A period
of very active proselytizing followed the movement's foundation in 1647,
with preachers spreading the word in England and Ireland, and traveling
to Germany, the Netherlands and the American Colonies. William Edmundson
convened the very first Quaker meeting in Ireland in Lurgan in 1655. He
was known as "The Great Hammer of Ireland," a remarkably muscular
nickname for a peace-loving Quaker, but one which reflected his temperament
and military background. Edmundson had served in the Cromwellian army,
and went on to achieve fame in Ireland and beyond, as a preacher in his
own right, and had much to do with the establishment of Quakerism in North
Carolina. It is reasonable to ascribe, at least in part, the Harlans'
specific choice of the Lurgan area as the place to settle, to their awareness
of a significant Quaker presence there.
Later on the Quaker movement, in a manner of speaking, turned in upon
itself, losing its missionary zeal, ceasing to seek converts, and developing
a tendency to exclusivity together with an obsession with internal discipline.
In America, a series of disastrous schisms split the movement, and congregations
dwindled as members drifted away to other denominations, or in the worst
case were "cast out" or "disowned" when they disagreed
with the elders
. often over relatively trivial matters. Things
were quite different in Quakerism's early days, with the first wave of
converts like the Harlan brothers being much more outward looking, and
engaging in enthusiastic proselytizing. Paradoxically, this period of
exponential growth was also the era in which the Friends were obliged
to endure the most vicious persecution. In England, Quakers were the target
of a series of oppressive legislative measures passed between 1662 and
1665, including the Quaker Act, the Five-Mile Act, the Test Act, and the
Conventicle Acts, and it is said that more than 300 Friends died in jail,
and 200 were transported as slaves to the West Indies. It was not until
1689 that these oppressive laws were repealed with the passage of the
Toleration Act, but in the meantime many Quakers had been severely mistreated.
Nor was persecution limited to England. In America, the Puritan authorities
of Massachusetts found their beliefs and practices were particularly objectionable,
and in 1659 they went so far as to hang four Quakers on Boston Common.
Principle is one thing, and money is another, and from the authorities
point of view, failure of the Quakers to pay tithes was the last straw.
"Tithes", nominally a tenth of income, can be thought of as
a church tax, and were the main source of income for the Established Church.
As non-Anglicans, Quakers regarded tithing as a rank injustice, and by
refusing to pay up, laid themselves open to prosecution. Because of inertia,
folk tend to resign themselves to this sort of injustice, but when pushed
beyond a certain point, like the Israelites departing the land of Egypt,
they decide to vote with their feet. Those offenders lucky enough to escape
jail had crops or property forcibly seized in lieu of payment, and opposition
to tithing was undoubtedly explains why many early Quakers pulled up stakes
and headed for greener pastures. This process sometimes involved a series
of such removes, and the Brothers' peregrinations fit this pattern. As
it happens in their case, we can back this up with a contemporary news
item:
"In 1680, George Harland, of County Down had taken from him in Tithe,
by Daniel MacConnell, twelve stooks and a half of oats, three stooks and
a half of barley, and five loads of hay, all worth ten shillings and ten
pence"{17}.
Quakers believed in plain speech and plain dress; titles were not used
nor hats doffed as a token of respect; they addressed each other as "thee"
and "thou" instead of "you"; and the Quaker gray of
their clothing, unadorned by lapels or fancy buttons, together with the
flat hat, made the Quaker recognizable from afar. Denied careers in the
military, academic or professional world, they gravitated into business
and manufacturing, where because of abstemious life style, willingness
to work long hours, refusal to haggle, and punctiliousness about keeping
their word and meeting their obligations, many achieved considerable financial
success.
In America, the story of the Friends is inextricably bound with the foundation
of Pennsylvania and the career of Sir William Penn, the Younger. His father
Admiral Sir William Penn (1621-1670) was a professional naval officer,
who not only contrived to survive the political pitfalls which beset his
Navy colleagues during the Commonwealth period, but became involved with
the Restoration of 1660, and the return of Charles II to the throne of
England. While superintending the family estates in Ireland, his son William
Penn (1644-1718) became a Quaker. He proselytized actively there, and
it is not inconceivable that the Harlans would have heard him preach in
Lurgan.
Admiral Penn had loaned 12,000 pounds to King Charles at a juncture when
the latter was in financial straits, and in 1681 to settle this obligation,
Penn's son persuaded the King to grant him a tract of land west of the
Delaware River, 40,000 square-miles in extent, roughly speaking, modern
Pennsylvania and Delaware. The grant abutted lands granted to the Duke
of York (now New York and New Jersey), and those granted to Lord Baltimore
(now Maryland).
Penn's plan was to found a colony based on Quaker principles, a "Holy
Experiment" as he called it, and starting in 1681 broadsheets promoting
the venture were distributed widely at Quaker meetings in Ireland, prompting
a trickle of pioneers set off to the New World. A.C. Myers {18}, suggests
that in the next few years there was considerable interaction between
the Colony and Ireland, people going back and forth, and letters from
the pioneers, describing their life in America, being passed from hand
to hand at the Quaker Meetings. Thus the members of the Lurgan Meeting
all knew of the Colony, and it is not difficult to see how George and
Michael Harlan became persuaded that their future lay across the ocean.
Some Irish Quakers went out to the Colony as indentured servants, but
the Brothers had enough money to purchase land before they left Ireland.
As relatively early arrivals, they settled in the eastern part of the
territory, near where New Castle, Delaware, now stands, ultimately purchasing
land on Brandywine Creek. Quaker dominance in the affairs of Pennsylvania
was to continue until the latter half of the 18th Century, when during
the Indian Wars and the subsequent War of Independence, their unwillingness
to bear arms brought them into conflict with the spirit of the times.
As a footnote, James Logan (1674-1751), a giant figure in the history
of Pennsylvania Quakerism, was born and brought up in Lurgan, and would
have been 13 years of age at the time when the Brothers sailed for America.
Logan looked back with little pleasure to his days in Lurgan, but we can
be sure he, both in Ireland and America, would have known the Brothers.
Later Irish History
The Brothers left for America in 1687, and while Irish history subsequent
to that date is of less significance to the Harlan Family in America,
than that which preceded it, it is worth tying up some loose ends and
summarizing what happened over the next years. In 1688, the English Parliament
lost patience with the Catholic sympathies of James II, and in what is
known as the Glorious Revolution, invited his son-in-law William, Prince
of Orange, to assume the crown as William III. An outstanding account
of the events which led up to this is offered by John Carswell {19}. In
1689, following the flight of James II to Ireland and his raising an army
there, William III arrived with his own forces, and went on to defeat
the Jacobites in a series of engagements of which the most celebrated
was the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. At different times during the campaign,
both opposing armies passed through Lurgan, seriously disrupting the affairs
of the inhabitants, so from that point of view the timing of the Brothers'
departure was impeccable. It should be underlined that although Ireland
was the focus of Europe in those immediate years, the military battles
there were mere skirmishes when viewed as part of a much wider conflict.
The War of the League of Augsburg (1688-1697) pitted France against England
and several other countries, and included many theaters of war and fighting
in many places around the world, including what is now Nova Scotia and
New York State. It ended with the Peace of Rijswick in 1697, and a century
of relative tranquility (by Irish standards) followed. Discontent continued
to simmer, eventually resulting in Rebellion of the United Irishmen in
1798. This was an important event in Irish history, but one that is beyond
the scope of our study.
To summarize our story: George and Michael, who founded the Harlan dynasty
in the United States, spent a few years in Ireland, and we have tried
to cast some light for their reasons for leaving England, explain their
choice of location in Ireland, and then consider what drew them to America.
In the process we have attempted to show how these peregrinations fitted
in to the big picture and what was going on in the wider world in which
they lived.
Acknowledgments
This note could not have been put together without the kind assistance
of several people. Dr. Robin Harland, my brother who lives in Belfast,
drove us round the Lurgan area to get an idea of the area in which the
Brothers lived. Among others who helped were Dr. John McCavitt, Dr. Eoin
Magennis, Arthur G. Chapman, Prof. Gerry Stockman, and Sean McCartan.
Besides his book on the Flight of the Earls, Dr. McCavitt wrote the article
on Sir Arthur Chichester in the recently published Oxford University Press
Dictionary of National Biography. He was very generous with his time and
expertise, and kept me straight on several important points. Dr. Magennis,
historian and topographer at the Centre for Cross-Border Studies, Armagh,
is another contributor to the DNB, being responsible for eight articles
dealing with figures important in Irish ecclesiastical history and topography.
Arthur Chapman was a former Principal of The Friends School, Lisburn,
and an expert on the history of Quakerism in Ireland. Dr. Gerard Stockman
is Professor Emeritus of Celtic Languages at Queen's University Belfast,
and General Editor of the Northern Ireland Place-Name Project. Sean McCartan
is a professional genealogist with a special interest in the history of
Kinelarty in North Down and the story of the McCartan clan.
References
{1}. John E. Wills' 1688: A Global History, Granta
Books, London, 2001. ISBN
1-86207-482-8
{2}.Winston Graham: The Spanish Armadas, New York, 1972
{3}. The four-hundredth anniversary of this event will soon be upon
us. For a careful analysis of the story, we highly recommend Dr. John
McCavitt's highly readable monograph, The Flight of the Earls, Gill & Macmillan,
Dublin, 2002. ISBN: 0717130479, and see also Dr. McCavitt's website at: www.theflightoftheearls.net.
{4}. The Ulster Plantation (1605 - 1697) by Gwen Rawlings-Barry http://canadasulsterscots.tripod.com/Plantation.htm
{5}. Antonia Fraser: The Gunpowder Plot: Terror and Faith in 1605, London,
1996.
{6}. Place-Names of Northern Ireland. Vols. 19. General Editor
Gerard Stockman. The Northern Ireland Place-Name Project, Dept. of Celtic
Studies, the Queen's University of Belfast. 1996
{7}. http://www.lurganancestry.net
{8}. http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~mcclell2/homepage/ulster.htm
{9}. Raymond Gillespie: Colonial Ulster: the settlement of East Ulster,
1600-1641, Cork, 1985
{10}. See:[http://scripts.ireland.com/ancestor/magazine/emigration/ulster.htm]
{11}. http://www.battlehill395.freeserve.co.uk/facts%20about%20the%20ulster%20s
cots%20part%20four.htm
{12}. http://www.swan.ac.uk/history/teaching/teaching%20resources/PlaguetoAids/
2004presentationNew_Folder2/jodiesimsIrish%20Emigration.htm
http://www.rootsweb.com/~irlkik/ihm/ire1841.htm
{13}.http://myfamhrtgen.tripod.com/mcginnishistory.htm
{14}.http://www.doyle.com.au/wild_geese.htm
{15}. The Honourable Society of the Irish Brigade http://home.earthlink.net/~rggsibiba/html/sib/sib.html
{16}. Mark G. McLaughlin: The Wild Geese, London, 1980
{17}. William Stockdale: A Great Cry of Oppression, [cited by A. C. Myers:
Immigration of the Irish Quakers into Pennsylvania 1682-1750 , p. 321]
{18}. A. C. Myers, Immigration of the Irish Quakers into Pennsylvania,
1682-1750, 1902
{19}. John Carswell: The Descent on England: A Study of the Engish Revolution
of 1688 and its Background, New York, 1969.
|